global economy, it is increasingly common for companies require enterprise printing multiple geographic locations. When a company begins to search for the print spooling of advanced solutions available in the market, which will soon see that there were two distinct schools (if not polar) of thought regarding advanced spooling software implementation strategy.
The two strategies are either to use a single centralized print server or to install spooling software on various application servers distributed across the enterprise. Both of these approaches have advantages and disadvantages.
The centralized print server model
In the centralized print server model, the company would simply install the print management software on a single central server accessible the entire company.
One of the advantages of a centralized print server is that it allows a single point of control and supervision of all enterprise print jobs and queues. This model can be easier since it is of a single standard solution, which requires less administrator training and fewer printer definitions to maintain. Because it is a single standard solution rather than a solution to be installed on multiple servers, it has the potential to save a company money through lower software licensing costs.
However, while this model offers the single point of control, a major drawback is that it offers a single point of failure. Not only does this imply enterprise-wide downtime in case of a crash of the print server or otherwise going offline, but there are also significant concerns around disaster recovery situations. In the case of a disaster at the centralized printing position, the print operations would be in line indefinitely until the location could recover or until a different server location could be selected to re-install and re-deploy the solution of printing.
This seems to be a fairly significant limitation in itself, but the centralized print server model also entails a loss of autonomy to the local print site level, where administrators do not have the ability to manage local queues and print jobs. In addition, the implementation of the central solution, print spool requires multiple hops over the network, consuming precious bandwidth and increasing the latency of print times.
Print Server Model distributed
The print server model of distributed, on the other hand, is installed in multiple locations across the company - is plotted multiple regional print servers all the way to installing on each client workstation throughout the company.
The advantages of this print server model is that print jobs and queues can be controlled locally, with less reliance on support and print the central administrators. Since the print requests are made locally, the amount of demand for printing and the bandwidth used on the central print server in reduced exponentially traffic, with consequent improvement of the time and the response of the printer performance. Finally, the distributed print server model offers a degree of inherent redundancy since downtime at one location does not imply enterprise-wide termination of print processes.
However, the benefits of distributed print server model are controlled by the increase in costs for the company. Multiple installations will mean multiple software license costs, which increases the cost of the initial installation along with the increase of the maintenance cost of the server software through the license renewal fees. Increasing the number of separate installations will also increase the cost of training and maintaining IT staff proficiency in the software.
In the distributed print server model, you also lose the centralized control that makes the centralized model so appealing. You also have other print definitions to keep the distributed model.
decisions, decisions
The advantages of these solutions appear to be largely mutually exclusive of each other. However, one 's can deduce the significant advantages of a company would enjoy if the' king could implement a mixed solution for print management that would provide the advantages of the - central print server (the maintenance of a fewer printer definitions, the ability to print from any position in the company to any printer business, along with lower licensing costs would expect with central print management) alongside the benefits of the distributed print server (traffic software and lower bandwidth requirements on a centralized server, the highest performance with minimal latency press, and local print job and print queue control).
To implement a blended solution, a company can try to integrate two separate print management solutions - a solution for the management of the centralized printing and a distributed solution. However, this could turn out to be not only expensive, but difficult to effectively perform the desired functions.
packages of print management programs exist that offer hybrid functionality, however. This solution allows the customer to implement a truly distributed print environment while maintaining the advantages of a centralized system. They have far fewer print definitions to maintain, an enterprise view of job / queues, a single standard solution, less administrator training, and low rents.
These multi-functional models is a software OM Plus V2 Moreover Technologies. In a hybrid output solution like that, the software is installed on a server in each center. Only local queues are defined in each center (requiring minimal administration and maintenance). The software gives each server the ability to automatically "advertise" its queues to all the other servers in the network with the same software installed. In this way, all queues are available for all systems even though they are defined only once. The user interface of each installation allows users (with appropriate security) to view all jobs and printers on the network from a single status screen. System administration privileges are set to limit the functions performed locally against Central, which gives administrators centralized control what you normally only found in a Central Management Print Server program.
When a print job is spooled, the printer definition is looked for on the local server. If the printer is not found locally, then the software-enabled server search for other software-enabled server for the printer and gives the print job accordingly. This functionality allows all printers to be available to all systems. All local jobs are printed locally ensuring efficient use of low network latency and high performance.
With this particular software, license fees are minimized because the license fee is based on the number of queues defined on each server. Therefore, only small licenses are required locally. This means that the number of queues and the associated price remained low. A tool print management as this provides a real distributed printing management solution that eliminates redundant printer definitions across the enterprise, while allowing printing on printers both the local and remote servers.
0 Komentar